This lawsuit established important facts about these defective earplugs but didn’t address the claims of service members who used the earplugs and suffered damages like hearing loss. In this whistleblower suit, 3M admitted that it was aware as far back as 2000 that the earplugs they manufactured did not have any noise reduction effect.Īs a result of this false claim, 3M agreed to pay the U.S. In July 2018, the Department of Justice announced that it had reached a settlement with the Combat Arms earplugs manufacturer, 3M. Our 3M Combat Arms earplugs attorneys understand the risk posed by defective products.
#Combat arms earplugs free
If you or someone you know experienced a loss of hearing while serving in the armed forces, contact Haun Mena today for a free consultation.This is a close-up of a pair of black and yellow earplugs. Because the Combat Arms Earplugs version 2 (CAEv2) was no longer used after 2015, it is important that you file your claim immediately if you believe you were injured by 3M earplugs while serving in the United States Military.Īs a result of 3M’s defective Combat Arms earplugs, active duty military may have been wrongfully exposed to increased risk of hearing loss or tinnitus. However, when a company fraudulently conceals important information from consumers, some courts will agree to extend the time allowed for filing based on the manufacturer’s attempt to conceal information.
Most states only allow two years or less to bring a claim for a defective product. The statute of limitations is a defense that allows a defendant to avoid liability if too much time has passed from the date of the defendant’s negligence. Because of the length of time that has passed from when these earplugs were used, we anticipate that 3M will attempt to avoid all responsibility for injuries caused by these earplugs by asserting the defense of statute of limitations. The Combat Arms Earplugs version 2 (CAEv2) were used between 20. Is there a deadline for filing a claim against 3m for defective earplugs? If you were in the military, or worked around the military, during this time period, you may have a claim if you also experienced hearing loss or tinnitus. However, based on the information that has been disclosed publicly, we know that the Combat Arms Earplugs version 2 (CAEv2) were issued to military personnel and government contractors between 20. As additional discovery is conducted, we will all learn additional information regarding what 3M knew, or should have known, about the defective nature of its Combat Arms earplugs. Right now, lawyers across the country are working hard to establish that 3M knew that it was selling a defective product to the U.S. We expect that 3M will fight all cases brought against them in the coming months and years.
While we have learned valuable information from the allegations brought against 3M, the settlement does not mean that your case is automatically established. 3M has not agreed to compensate soldiers and contractors who were exposed to injury as a result of 3M’s Combat Arms earplugs. The $9.1 Million settlement 3M reached with the federal government in 2018 does not mean that 3M has agreed to accept responsibility for their defective product. (3M Company) What does the 3m whistleblower settlement mean to me?
0 kommentar(er)
